This notion of inaccurately attributing dental spirochetes to band 41 is addressed by a lyme doctor, which was cited in this post:
http://www.latitudes...art=#entry56240
Band 41 appearing by itself usually warrants further investigation and clinical evaluation by a Lyme expert.
I’m not familiar with the science that states that half the “normal” population is Band 41 positive. Could you provide further info/citation. Thanks.
Well I don't know if you are stating this question to me, but PacificMama, you seem to make some statements that are always in the favor of lyme, and I think everyone should understand that all the statements made about lyme and testing and conclusions are all pretty much not exactly 'science' in the sense that these are not universally agreed upon in the medical field. The link you provide here...is this also not just an 'opinion' of some lyme doctor? I don't see any science to back up what he is saying either.
So I am only telling you what I learned from a recent doctor visit and this doctor is definitely an expert in the field of PANDAS I can tell you that, he has more than 20 years of research behind him. He tests for lyme in the initial work up for PANDAS patients to rule out any other causes of symptoms. I did not state he was a lyme expert. But he does have data to back up his testing of lyme and the percentage of patients who have the band 41, he explained all this to me, it is a little over my head but I know we discussed it. He was very interested in this at one time because he found it interesting that alot of his Pandas patients did have only band 41 and wondered if it was of any significance to Pandas since it might be some gut infection or as he explained, most probably dental flora bacteria. I don't claim to understand all this too much, but I did ask him these questions about what I read here.
And in that other link with the discussion from Dr. T., I see you posted a reply to him that you think his findinds were very interesting and you appreciated his work, but now you say he is no lyme expert. I think I am offended that you say in your other post here that he is just a neurologist that is recently specializing in PANDAS, but he is a very dedicated and obviously very smart doctor for alot of kids here nonetheless and I won't go into it but I do know there is another doctor who is just an immunologist who has 'recently' delved into PANDAS, so one might argue he is not an expert either, yet he is diagnosing PANDAS,and also diagnosing lyme from what I have read here too, so what. You can keep telling people to talk to an LLMD expert or whatever, but I hope some here are not missing some other ideas to help their kids if every time they are being directed to lyme and these lyme doctors who I don't think know it all. I beleive that even the 'diagnosis' of lyme is not always true and correct, some should understand that it is a clinical diagnosis and there is no test that can say for sure, and it is the same for PANDAS I think, so I don't think anyone can say for sure, I see alot of speculation here and it is hard because I am still trying to find some information on the PANDAS subject but often it is derailed to lyme so it has been unavoidable to read on. I guess I will soon be wondering about lyme and I guess I know where to go for info.