Megs_Mom Posted April 1, 2010 Report Posted April 1, 2010 http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/emergi...es-plenty-proof It's an amazing treasure trove of research information related to infectious causes of mental illness.
MomWithOCDSon Posted April 2, 2010 Report Posted April 2, 2010 Thanks! More fuel for the fire I keep stoking under our doctors!
mama2alex Posted April 3, 2010 Report Posted April 3, 2010 Thank you for posting this! I just picked up her book at the library yesterday and started reading it today. If the Forward is any indication, this is going to be a very interesting read. Here's a sample: "The ancient and formerly revered scientific rule known as Occam's razor, which holds that the simplest explanation is probably the correct explanation, has no credence in the Brave New World of contested diseases. Common logic, anecdotal evidence, and on-the-ground clinical observations - by which I mean the simple process of doctors listening to and thinking about what their patients are telling them - are held in disregard by the most powerful players in the research establishment. These power players include pious academicians who have little or no contact with patients who suffer from these maladies, yet form opinions and theories about them that carry far more weight in the medical community than is scientifically warranted. They reduce science to theology, changing the essential question from "What do the data say?" to "Do you believe in this disease or do you not?" Sound familiar?
Megs_Mom Posted April 3, 2010 Author Report Posted April 3, 2010 Thank you for posting this! I just picked up her book at the library yesterday and started reading it today. If the Forward is any indication, this is going to be a very interesting read. Here's a sample: "The ancient and formerly revered scientific rule known as Occam's razor, which holds that the simplest explanation is probably the correct explanation, has no credence in the Brave New World of contested diseases. Common logic, anecdotal evidence, and on-the-ground clinical observations - by which I mean the simple process of doctors listening to and thinking about what their patients are telling them - are held in disregard by the most powerful players in the research establishment. These power players include pious academicians who have little or no contact with patients who suffer from these maladies, yet form opinions and theories about them that carry far more weight in the medical community than is scientifically warranted. They reduce science to theology, changing the essential question from "What do the data say?" to "Do you believe in this disease or do you not?" Sound familiar? Every chapter, every page of this book felt like a life we were already living in some way. I learned SO much about the science & the research - it's an amazing book. It made me angry - it made me wonder - it made me hopeful. So glad you found it at your library!
smartyjones Posted April 3, 2010 Report Posted April 3, 2010 meg's mom - has your daughter been diagnosed with lyme or were you reading this for knowledge?
Fixit Posted April 3, 2010 Report Posted April 3, 2010 what book is this?? Thank you for posting this! I just picked up her book at the library yesterday and started reading it today. If the Forward is any indication, this is going to be a very interesting read. Here's a sample: "The ancient and formerly revered scientific rule known as Occam's razor, which holds that the simplest explanation is probably the correct explanation, has no credence in the Brave New World of contested diseases. Common logic, anecdotal evidence, and on-the-ground clinical observations - by which I mean the simple process of doctors listening to and thinking about what their patients are telling them - are held in disregard by the most powerful players in the research establishment. These power players include pious academicians who have little or no contact with patients who suffer from these maladies, yet form opinions and theories about them that carry far more weight in the medical community than is scientifically warranted. They reduce science to theology, changing the essential question from "What do the data say?" to "Do you believe in this disease or do you not?" Sound familiar?
mama2alex Posted April 3, 2010 Report Posted April 3, 2010 Cure Unknown: Inside the Lyme Epidemic by Pamela Weintraub what book is this?? Thank you for posting this! I just picked up her book at the library yesterday and started reading it today. If the Forward is any indication, this is going to be a very interesting read. Here's a sample: "The ancient and formerly revered scientific rule known as Occam's razor, which holds that the simplest explanation is probably the correct explanation, has no credence in the Brave New World of contested diseases. Common logic, anecdotal evidence, and on-the-ground clinical observations - by which I mean the simple process of doctors listening to and thinking about what their patients are telling them - are held in disregard by the most powerful players in the research establishment. These power players include pious academicians who have little or no contact with patients who suffer from these maladies, yet form opinions and theories about them that carry far more weight in the medical community than is scientifically warranted. They reduce science to theology, changing the essential question from "What do the data say?" to "Do you believe in this disease or do you not?" Sound familiar?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now