Jump to content
ACN Latitudes Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thank you for posting this! I just picked up her book at the library yesterday and started reading it today.

 

If the Forward is any indication, this is going to be a very interesting read. Here's a sample:

 

"The ancient and formerly revered scientific rule known as Occam's razor, which holds that the simplest explanation is probably the correct explanation, has no credence in the Brave New World of contested diseases. Common logic, anecdotal evidence, and on-the-ground clinical observations - by which I mean the simple process of doctors listening to and thinking about what their patients are telling them - are held in disregard by the most powerful players in the research establishment. These power players include pious academicians who have little or no contact with patients who suffer from these maladies, yet form opinions and theories about them that carry far more weight in the medical community than is scientifically warranted. They reduce science to theology, changing the essential question from "What do the data say?" to "Do you believe in this disease or do you not?"

 

Sound familiar?

Posted
Thank you for posting this! I just picked up her book at the library yesterday and started reading it today.

 

If the Forward is any indication, this is going to be a very interesting read. Here's a sample:

 

"The ancient and formerly revered scientific rule known as Occam's razor, which holds that the simplest explanation is probably the correct explanation, has no credence in the Brave New World of contested diseases. Common logic, anecdotal evidence, and on-the-ground clinical observations - by which I mean the simple process of doctors listening to and thinking about what their patients are telling them - are held in disregard by the most powerful players in the research establishment. These power players include pious academicians who have little or no contact with patients who suffer from these maladies, yet form opinions and theories about them that carry far more weight in the medical community than is scientifically warranted. They reduce science to theology, changing the essential question from "What do the data say?" to "Do you believe in this disease or do you not?"

 

Sound familiar?

 

Every chapter, every page of this book felt like a life we were already living in some way. I learned SO much about the science & the research - it's an amazing book. It made me angry - it made me wonder - it made me hopeful. So glad you found it at your library!

Posted

what book is this??

 

 

Thank you for posting this! I just picked up her book at the library yesterday and started reading it today.

 

If the Forward is any indication, this is going to be a very interesting read. Here's a sample:

 

"The ancient and formerly revered scientific rule known as Occam's razor, which holds that the simplest explanation is probably the correct explanation, has no credence in the Brave New World of contested diseases. Common logic, anecdotal evidence, and on-the-ground clinical observations - by which I mean the simple process of doctors listening to and thinking about what their patients are telling them - are held in disregard by the most powerful players in the research establishment. These power players include pious academicians who have little or no contact with patients who suffer from these maladies, yet form opinions and theories about them that carry far more weight in the medical community than is scientifically warranted. They reduce science to theology, changing the essential question from "What do the data say?" to "Do you believe in this disease or do you not?"

 

Sound familiar?

Posted

Cure Unknown: Inside the Lyme Epidemic by Pamela Weintraub

 

 

what book is this??

 

 

Thank you for posting this! I just picked up her book at the library yesterday and started reading it today.

 

If the Forward is any indication, this is going to be a very interesting read. Here's a sample:

 

"The ancient and formerly revered scientific rule known as Occam's razor, which holds that the simplest explanation is probably the correct explanation, has no credence in the Brave New World of contested diseases. Common logic, anecdotal evidence, and on-the-ground clinical observations - by which I mean the simple process of doctors listening to and thinking about what their patients are telling them - are held in disregard by the most powerful players in the research establishment. These power players include pious academicians who have little or no contact with patients who suffer from these maladies, yet form opinions and theories about them that carry far more weight in the medical community than is scientifically warranted. They reduce science to theology, changing the essential question from "What do the data say?" to "Do you believe in this disease or do you not?"

 

Sound familiar?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...