alsmom Posted May 20, 2017 Report Posted May 20, 2017 Hi there, My four year old son has PANS and we were told by his immunologist that he will need IVIg. We got a 2nd opinion and were told that subcutaneous IVIg (SCIg) is the better route to go because it has less negative side effects but just as effective as standard IVIg. Our immunologist said SCIg is not as effective as standard IVIg in his experience. Anyone have any experience with SCIg? Good or bad? Thanks!
frikfrak Posted May 20, 2017 Report Posted May 20, 2017 Hi, My DS (26) had 5 treatments subQ, he is mentally disabled due to lyme / babesia and who knows what else. Been treating for 7 years but no better. The subQ did nothing, we were told by his immunologist that subQ also was better because less side effects but it didn't work. frikfrak
alsmom Posted May 21, 2017 Author Report Posted May 21, 2017 Thank you frikfrak for your reply! We really are concerned about having our toddler have to undergo the standard IVIg, but we don't want to waste time with subcutaneous either. Thanks again for sharing your experience!
PAN-PANDAS-LYME-FAMILY Posted June 8, 2017 Report Posted June 8, 2017 Hi Alsmom, I am looking for an immunologist for my PANS child. Would you recommend the first one that you went to who suggested ivig? Is he/she PANS/PANDAS friendly?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now