Jump to content
ACN Latitudes Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted
I received my sons C Kinase today. It was 161. This is within normal range , correct?

No, that's solidly w/in PANDAS range-high.

Now what? You mean I am not crazy? Thank you Lord

Posted
I received my sons C Kinase today. It was 161. This is within normal range , correct?

No, that's solidly w/in PANDAS range-high.

Now what? You mean I am not crazy? Thank you Lord

Did the lab send you copies of Dr. Cunningham's research papers? On page 3 of one of those, there is a graph that shows the ranges of CamKII regarding PANDAS, Sydenham's and controls. If I remember right, 161 is rather high, 200 is the bottom of the sydenham's range.

Posted
I received my sons C Kinase today. It was 161. This is within normal range , correct?

No, that's solidly w/in PANDAS range-high.

Now what? You mean I am not crazy? Thank you Lord

 

You made me smile tonight - I SO remember that exact feeling when we got our results - and yours are much higher. Welcome to the club - sorry you are here, but so glad that you are finding answers that can lead to the right treatment.

Posted
I received my sons C Kinase today. It was 161. This is within normal range , correct?

No, that's solidly w/in PANDAS range-high.

Now what? You mean I am not crazy? Thank you Lord

 

You made me smile tonight - I SO remember that exact feeling when we got our results - and yours are much higher. Welcome to the club - sorry you are here, but so glad that you are finding answers that can lead to the right treatment.

It is such a bitter sweet Blessing. I am smiling too. For 7 months I have had many sleepless nights, arguments with my husband and family. Tonight I printed the email and showed it off.

Posted (edited)
I received my sons C Kinase today. It was 161. This is within normal range , correct?

No, that's solidly w/in PANDAS range-high.

Now what? You mean I am not crazy? Thank you Lord

 

lol...well, you still could be crazy. :huh: ..... but your son's values do fall in the high/mid PANDAS range. Here is the paper http://www.pandasnetwork.org/CunninghamJNICaMKinase.pdf . Look at figure 3a and 3b

on page 3.

 

"Normal" for your son would be closer to 100.

Edited by EAMom

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...