kim Posted January 10, 2006 Report Share Posted January 10, 2006 My sons also have tics and we recently had IGg testing done through MAYO labs. As I understand it, they send this testing on to IBT labs. I spoke with someone at MAYO who said this is Flouroenzyme Immunoassay testing. I'm wondering if anyone can comment on the reliability of this type testing? My insurance covered this test so I went for it, but my Pediatrician is unable to help with the results, as he had no idea what it even was. 13 year old son tested positive to wheat, barley, rye, oat 9 yr. old egg, peanut, pork and cow's milk. Under reference range, there was only <2. Most of the results were 5 and 6's except 9 yr. old who is an extremely limited eater had a 13 for peanut (peanut butter is one of about 4 foods he'll eat). I also had the Organix Dysbiosis Profile done on youngest son through Metametrix. His D-Arabinitol was 51 which put him in about the 75-80% range? I take it this means that 75% of the children 12 and under had a lower reading? Again, I'm wondering how many people have used this test and if you felt the results were reliable as an indication of a yeast problem. Any comments would be greatly appreciated. Kim Reply.........(from another parent) Dear Kim, The amazing fact is that the body is "believing" that the food is something bad. When there is a bad digestion process, food molecules are not well broken (hydrolyzed) and due mainly to its size, the body can not see those molecules as food but as an bad invader (antigen). Once those big and bad food molecules enters to the body through the intestinal wall, the body defense mechanism is to put a "flag" on them in order to indicate to defense cells (leukocytes) that those molecules shall be destroy. The "flag" to signal the invader molecules is the Antibody called IgG Immunoglobulin G. So if your test is indicating that you have more than 2, it means that recently the body has detected some invader molecules and is having a "lot of flags" circulating around ready to bind another invader big molecule. IgG test basically means that some of the food molecules that gives high values were detected in the blood and are being processes as antigens. So for example, in the case of peanut high value, it indicates that the body is "processing" the peanut by using the immune system. Sometimes the body mechanism is to use the enzymes of the immune system to end digestion of big molecules. It seems to be the indication of this high value. This is bad because those enzymes are there for eliminating bacteria, yeasts, virus and bad cells, not for doing digestion. Oral enzymes are going to help you for two basic points: - Improve hydrolysis of food molecules, in the way the body will not recognize them as antigen. - Reduce the high values of circulating antibodies. Regards, VICTOR > Victor, > > Thank you so much for the reply. The high reading for peanut gave this test > credibility in my mind because it's one of the things conventional allergy > testing showed a mild reaction to, and again, because it's one of the few > foods he eats. The pork reaction confused me, because he hasn't eaten any meat > of any kind since baby food dinners. I can't imagine where he would even get > trace exposure to pork. > > One of my main concerns was that this test would miss a sensitivity to > something like dairy or wheat (he will eat 1 type of cracker and pretzels), orange > juice etc. I would hate to feel ok about giving these things if this test > was not as reliable as ELISA or other tests it seems like most have done. > > I was wondering if I could have your permission to post your reply to > another group? Since this was a test that my insurance covered, and I was able to > get reg. Ped to order it, I thought others on a TS/tic board might be > interested too. Again, thank you! > > Kim REPLY Kim, Thanks for your answer. Maybe you do not have to analyze the lab results in such detailed way. Because, what the antibody flags is sometimes not so easy to catch. Antibody is very small and can just bind very small parts on a food molecule. For example it can happens that as your kid is not eaten meat, then the antibody was confusing the pork meat because it is having the same molecule part that it binds elsewere. Anyway, by looking the results what is evident is a framework of general bad nutrition in which the body is sensing several foods as antigens (fortunatelly not as allergens). It can be more like a diagnosis of leaky gut. If you start with enzymes, you will eliminate the bad framework, the leaky gut and the running antibodies. You can place my message in other places. Regards, VICTOR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kim Posted January 18, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2006 If anyone is trying to talk their Dr. into ordering IgG testing, this may help convince them. Gluten Ataxia and Post-Streptococcal Central Nervous System Syndromes: Emerging Immune-mediated Disorders of the Central Nervous System? Wills A, Dale R, Giovannoni G. Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1 3BG, United Kingdom. G.Giovannoni@ion.ucl.ac.uk. There is an "emerging concept" that central nervous system dysfunction can be caused by an aberrant immune response triggered by exogenous antigens such as the food allergen gluten or streptococcal infection. The hypothesis of a gluten sensitive ataxia remains unproven, but is worthy of consideration. The data in support of this hypothesis require critical review before any treatment recommendations can be formulated. The idea that anti-gliadin antibody seropositivity per se justifies the term "gluten sensitivity" is important because it offers potential therapeutic possibilities, including simple exclusion diets, for patients with anti-gliadin antibody-associated ataxia. Post-streptococcal basal ganglia dysfunction has various manifestations, all of which fall into a relatively well-defined symptom complex or syndrome. Anti- basal ganglia antibodies that are associated with serologic evidence of recent streptococcal infection are a potential diagnostic marker for this group of disorders, which includes Sydenham's chorea (SC) as the prototype. More recently subjects with pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infection, Tourette's syndrome, obsessive-compulsive disorder and other movement disorders have been described in association with anti-basal ganglia antibodies. The apparent overlap between the clinical phenotype of SC, pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infections, Tourette's syndrome, and obsessive- compulsive disorder suggests that they may represent one disease entity. The current working hypothesis is that antibodies induced in response to streptococcal infection cross-react with antigenic determinants in the basal ganglia resulting in basal ganglia dysfunction. Although the experimental evidence is incomplete, there is sufficient evidence to support immune-mediated basal ganglia dysfunction as an emerging clinical entity. This has important implications for the diagnosis and treatment of subjects with these disorders. The latter includes the judicious use of antibiotic prophylaxis and immunomodulatory therapies. Apart from the diagnosis and management of SC, no consensus exists regarding the diagnosis and management of the other clinical entities within this group of disorders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giselle Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Awesome Kim - thanks for posting all this!!!! Giselle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kim Posted January 20, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 20, 2006 No problem Giselle Your posts have been soooooo helpful. I think so many times we soak up every post and get so much from them, but don't take the time to let the poster know how truly helpful their post was. Yours have been such a wealth of information, so thanks right back to you for many, many wonderful posts!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kim Posted July 15, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 15, 2006 bumping for azhorsegal This is another "main stream" medical article discussing this subject http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr...ent+and+...%22+ It has been speculated that the relatively high incidence of adverse reactions to food proteins in infancy, especially to cows’ milk protein, could be the result of an increased gut permeability to large molecules and the immaturity of local and systemic immunological responses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azhorsegal Posted July 15, 2006 Report Share Posted July 15, 2006 bumping for azhorsegal This is another "main stream" medical article discussing this subject http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr...ent+and+...%22+ It has been speculated that the relatively high incidence of adverse reactions to food proteins in infancy, especially to cows’ milk protein, could be the result of an increased gut permeability to large molecules and the immaturity of local and systemic immunological responses. Thanks Kim, My daughter had her blood drawn today for both the IgA tests, and unlike the one post said my pediatrician new exactly what tests were needed for Celiac, even though he thought my Naturopathic doctor's unconventional ways of testing for allergies was a hoax. He still understood the seriousness of making sure my daughter does not have Celiac. We are also scheduled to see an allergist next week to get blood tests to confirm her food allergies. Should here about the Celiac test sometime next week. Thanks for bumping this post up, gave me some more understanding on how this all works. THANKS! I'm so grateful to everyone here, as this tic disorder that my daugther has been diagnosed with doesn't seem as scary as it did, though I still know things might, and probably will get worse before they get better. At least I don't feel alone and if something happens it's nice to have people to talk with that's already been down this road. Thanks to everyone! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 15, 2006 Report Share Posted July 15, 2006 azhorsegal, I bumped up a list of tests that can uncover issues which commonly impact tics that I thought you may be interested in. Often certain labs specialize in certain lab tests. Carolyn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azhorsegal Posted July 15, 2006 Report Share Posted July 15, 2006 azhorsegal, I bumped up a list of tests that can uncover issues which commonly impact tics that I thought you may be interested in. Often certain labs specialize in certain lab tests. Carolyn THANKS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now