Pub Med

[kim]

Does anyone have the capability to interput this?

 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.f...5043&query_hl=6

[kim]

RESULTS: In phase I at HMO A, cumulative exposure at 3 months resulted in a significant positive association with tics (relative risk [RR]: 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-3.38). At HMO B, increased risks of language delay were found for cumulative exposure at 3 months (RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.01-1.27) and 7 months (RR: 1.07; 95% CI

 

The 1.89; 95% confidence interval-is the part I'm questioning

[mmazz]

Hi Kim;

 

The way I read it this is clearly bad science. My interpretation is that they are trying to disprove autism from thimerisol. There is so much bad science out there, but slowly the underground is starting to emerge and once the silient minority is sadly becoming the loud majority due to the increase in neurological disorders. The government, and the pharm companies better listen quick before any other children become harmed. I know for a fact that my children will not be injected again with this poison. Keep up the good work.

 

Be Well;

 

Marie

[kim]

Marie,

 

For anyone following this issue, especially regarding the questions we have about vaccinations/boosters, I wondered if this study may help my pediatrician understand my concern about having my boys boosters done, and if it would convince him to test titers instead of just "doing it". I can't tell how great the risk is of developing tics from the #'s in this study.

 

Anyway, you may want to read this thread on Braintalk as there is a debate going on right now that I'm following. This is the link to the 3rd page of the thread, so go back, to start reading if interested.

http://brain.hastypastry.net/forums/showth...?t=88719&page=3

 

Kim