thereishope Posted February 17, 2011 Report Posted February 17, 2011 Evidence-based guideline update: Plasmapheresis in neurologic disorders . http://www.icnapedia.org/content/home/news/1722-evidence-based-guideline-update-plasmapheresis-in-neurologic-disorders Final sentence "There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of plasmapheresis for myasthenia gravis, pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcus infection, and Sydenham chorea (Class III evidence, Level U)." Is this statement anything new?
Mary M Posted February 17, 2011 Report Posted February 17, 2011 I would just love for a grad student/research assistant to come and live at my house and observe.... Mary from Michigan
Phasmid Posted February 17, 2011 Report Posted February 17, 2011 No, but the interesting part is "...or refute..." what does THAT mean- that it should be left up to the care provider to decide! Like treatment in general should be left up to the care provider not these stupid insurance companies.
Iowadawn Posted February 18, 2011 Report Posted February 18, 2011 No, but the interesting part is "...or refute..." what does THAT mean- that it should be left up to the care provider to decide! Like treatment in general should be left up to the care provider not these stupid insurance companies. [/quote Not too up to date----Catch the date: through 2009. A lot has transpired since then.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now