norcalmom Posted September 8, 2010 Report Posted September 8, 2010 http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/Research/VaccineAdvEffectReview/2009-JUN-24/Meeting-Transcript-6-24-09.ashx something interesting I just came across. This is a transcript of a meeting regarding vaccines last year. cunningham presetnted for 30+ minutes, first half heart related, second gets more into pandas... here is the table of contents: UNEDITED VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Causal Inference: Steven Goodman 7 Biologic Mechanisms: Weighing the Evidence: 41 Douglas L. Weed Multiple Sclerosis: Stephen L. Hauser 75 Molecular Mimicry: Robert Fujinami 110 Molecular Mimicry: Madeleine W. Cunningham 134 Genetic Susceptibility in Vaccine Adverse Events: 161 Jason H. Moore NOTE: This is an unedited verbatim transcript of the meeting of the Committee to Review Adverse Effects of Vaccine, held on June 24, 2009, prepared by CASET Associates, Fairfax, VA, and is not an official report of the National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Engineering, or National Research Council (collectively “The National Academies”). Opinions and statements included in the transcript are solely those of the individual persons or participants at the meeting, and are not necessarily adopted or endorsed or verified as accurate by The National Academies.
Sylvia Posted September 9, 2010 Report Posted September 9, 2010 WOW~thanks for posting this norcalmom!!! http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/Research/VaccineAdvEffectReview/2009-JUN-24/Meeting-Transcript-6-24-09.ashx something interesting I just came across. This is a transcript of a meeting regarding vaccines last year. cunningham presetnted for 30+ minutes, first half heart related, second gets more into pandas... here is the table of contents: UNEDITED VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Causal Inference: Steven Goodman 7 Biologic Mechanisms: Weighing the Evidence: 41 Douglas L. Weed Multiple Sclerosis: Stephen L. Hauser 75 Molecular Mimicry: Robert Fujinami 110 Molecular Mimicry: Madeleine W. Cunningham 134 Genetic Susceptibility in Vaccine Adverse Events: 161 Jason H. Moore NOTE: This is an unedited verbatim transcript of the meeting of the Committee to Review Adverse Effects of Vaccine, held on June 24, 2009, prepared by CASET Associates, Fairfax, VA, and is not an official report of the National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Engineering, or National Research Council (collectively “The National Academies”). Opinions and statements included in the transcript are solely those of the individual persons or participants at the meeting, and are not necessarily adopted or endorsed or verified as accurate by The National Academies.
thereishope Posted January 18, 2011 Report Posted January 18, 2011 I was looking something up for a thread and found this mixed in with the search results. Did anyone read this? Is it worth reading? Its 100+ pages.
JAG10 Posted January 18, 2011 Report Posted January 18, 2011 I read through it, but I must admit most of it went over my head....except the "PANDAS parents flocking out of the walls" part.
peglem Posted January 19, 2011 Report Posted January 19, 2011 I started reading it, couldn't manage the whole thing, then sort of skimmed through. Worth reading if you can comprehend, I guess.
Johnsmom Posted January 19, 2011 Report Posted January 19, 2011 I read through it, but I must admit most of it went over my head....except the "PANDAS parents flocking out of the walls" part. I didnt see that part.
JAG10 Posted January 19, 2011 Report Posted January 19, 2011 I read through it, but I must admit most of it went over my head....except the "PANDAS parents flocking out of the walls" part. I didnt see that part. Page 151, last paragraph
norcalmom Posted January 19, 2011 Author Report Posted January 19, 2011 Cunninghams stuff starts on page 134. ..I think reading at least her part is worthwhile. Not just for the pandas stuff. She is one of our main advocates / researchers in the scientific community. Helps to understand where she is coming from. How, when, and for what, others in the scientific community look to her. I like it because it is more acndid than official statements, and gives a little insight. Its dated now, but still interesting.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now