Jump to content
ACN Latitudes Forums

Central figure in CDC vaccine cover-up absconds with $2M


CSP

Recommended Posts

It's not all over the news is it? Not getting the kind of coverage that Wakefield got. He happened to be on the wrong side of what is imperative that we all keep believing.

 

Has anyone heard any type of televised reporting on this? Anyone one who has followed the autism news has known that "science" of that study was horrible and was even pointed out in the paper itself (how data was added which may have skewed the results) but the headline was a different story.

 

This is something else that I haven't heard anything about (but haven't had much time for TV). No worry though, apparently it's just a benign pig virus . There must be studies on what happens to infants when you INJECT this virus into their tiny bodies, hau?

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...0032201897.html

 

FDA warns doctors about Glaxo rotavirus vaccine

 

WASHINGTON -- U.S. health officials urged pediatricians Monday to temporarily stop using one of two vaccines against a leading cause of diarrhea in babies, after discovering that doses of GlaxoSmithKline's Rotarix were contaminated with bits of an apparently benign pig virus.

For those of you who are interested in looking behind the vaccination scene, I think you might like to read this exchange. Google "New Zealand Parliament Paul Huchison," and see who this man is (the one who is involved in setting vaccination policy who obviously has no idea of what he's talking about) and read Hilary's scathing reply. This woman (Hilary Butler) was the single best source for helping me to come to the realization that the vaccination program was certainly not what I believed it to be (along with numerous other people who are dedicated to getting parents to educate themselves on this matter). She knows the science and can relay it in a way that the average person understands.

 

Remember a SIXTH TdaP was recently added to our vaccine schedule (for adolescence) with the hopes that waning immunity in this group would be boosted and cut the incidence of pertussis in infants. SIX????? If 5 isn't cutting it, WHY ARE PARENTS BUYING INTO THIS? Hilary's info on pertussis is something that I have never read before.

 

This is an excerpt from the final reply, but I hope you read the whole exchange

 

http://www.beyondconformity.org.nz/_blog/H...Paul_Hutchison/

 

The medical profession will never admit that the data on flu vaccines shows they don’t work, because to do so would be to admit that for 30 years, they’ve knowingly told New Zealanders porkies. And I know that, because I have enough studies of “useless” flu vaccines to sink a ship. But I’ll just attach one for you here, Paul. Simonsen 09.

 

Where is the wholesale emergence of the diseases you mentioned, in this country, with the current vaccination rates, or even the lower vaccination rates of 15 years ago?

 

Let’s leave out the whooping cough vaccine, which even the New Zealand medical literature (which I have neatly filed in date order) admits that the vaccine has done nothing to reduce either cases, or deaths. (Deaths wasn’t a hard one, since whooping cough deaths had reached bedrock before the vaccine was introduced, as did a lot of the other diseases, like diphtheria). The majority of children who get whooping cough now, are appropriately vaccinated, and the majority of babies who get it suffer primarily because their mothers were vaccinated, and the transplacental and breastmilk immunity immunisation transfers is now negligible. The numbers getting whooping cough in each epidemic cycle, hasn’t reduced since before the vaccine was introduced as a triple in 1961, and given that the single whooping cough vaccine had negligible use before that, (I have the data…) and was suspended for a few years from 1955 – 1961, that is irrelevant. Unfortunately for anyone who is vaccinated their immunity is faulty and the concept of “original sin” applies, something which I’m sure you know about. If you don’t, the attached article Cherry 2004 (one of many on this topic) will explain what I mean. This means that the key primary step of immunity to develop mucosal immunity to adenylate cyclase toxin (ACT), which was ignored because it can’t be incorporated in the whooping cough vaccine, is also ignored on the vaccinated person’s re-exposure. Vaccinated people re-exposed to whooping cough, respond to it, in the way in which their immune system is pre-programmed, result in those people not clearing the pertussis bacteria fast (as happens after natural immunity), and they become ready carriers and spreaders of whooping cough.

 

Cherry’s article is only one of the early articles in medical data bases, on this topic. It’s clear that the inability to put ACT into the vaccine is a fundamental flaw in terms of the pertussis vaccine, (since the “manufacture” and excretion of ACT from the bacteria is a process of disease, only started once the bacteria adheres to the base of the cilia on the bronchial wall). The aberrant immunity created by the vaccine, creates a situation whereby the vaccinated are now the most effective spreaders of the disease. The ones whose first attack was natural, are not likely to spread the disease, since their bronchials clear any reinfection bacteria very quickly. Again, this is all in the medical literature.

 

Not that the vaccine manufacturers can do anything about it, since just using parts of bacteria and toxins as your antigens, absolutely precludes immunity to ACT. However, they recognize the flaw, hence new research and studies on pertussis vaccines are looking at making one which is inhaled and has to initiate a mild infection, in order to achieve longer lasting immunity, quick bacterial clearance and a less aberrant immune response. But that will be decades away, if it even comes to fruition, since New Zealand has followed the mindless advice of CDC, to simply revaccinate every possible moving target within range of any child.

 

 

This is the whole series

 

http://www.beyondconformity.org.nz/_blog/H...d_to_be_bribed/

 

http://www.beyondconformity.org.nz/_blog/H...chison_replies/

 

http://www.beyondconformity.org.nz/_blog/H...Paul_Hutchison/

 

http://www.beyondconformity.org.nz/_blog/H...Paul_Hutchison/

 

 

Other reading

 

aluminum

 

http://www.generationrescue.org/binstock/0...imer-autism.htm

Edited by kim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I don't think we've heard the last from this man and personally I think he's a gift straight from heaven

 

http://www.ageofautism.com/2010/04/stateme...-sanctions.html

 

Statement from Dr. Andrew Wakefield Regarding GMC Hearing Sanctions

 

 

I recieved this in my email. As I was watching the "today," clip, I was waiting for them to get to some of the info that the article talked about regarding the children having been sick and them receiving vaccines. It didn't happen.

 

 

excerpt from:

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/36120715/ns/today-today_books/

 

Facing the trauma of autism diagnosis

Former NFLer Rodney Peete writes about his son’s condition

 

 

A few months before they hit that two-year mark, Holly took the twins in for a checkup with our pediatrician. They’d had ear infections and were both coming off a course of antibiotics. Holly asked the doctor if he would delay their next round of immunizations because she thought loading them up with that much medicine while they were still a bit weak from the antibiotics might be too much for their little bodies. She believes the doctor, a very old-school, by-the-book pediatrician, brushed off her concerns as those of an overly cautious first-time mom. He said he’d immunized hundreds of children and never had any such problems.

 

This didn’t sit right with Holly. Something about this disturbed what she calls her “mommy gut,” an instinct that moms have that goes beyond what professionals say. She asked him if there was any way he could break up the measles/mumps/rubella vaccination so that they would not have to get such a potent cocktail all at once. The doctor said that that couldn’t be done. Besides, the nurse said, the twins were behind in their immunizations. Part of the purpose of this visit was to get them all caught up.

 

 

 

Then I remembered reading this a little while back. The paper that started this thread is part of "what the science has shown." Wondering if the media is going to cave just as some real progress was being made in regards to open conversation on the safety of vaccination. bolding mine

 

http://www.ageofautism.com/2010/03/did-kat...ety-voices.html

 

There are groups out there that insist that vaccines are responsible for a variety of problems despite all scientific evidence to the contrary. We have reached out to media outlets to try to get them to not give the views of these people equal weight in their reporting to what science has shown and continues to show about the safety of vaccines,” (HERE) according to HHS Secretary, Kathleen Sebelius, in her interview with Arthur Allen for The Reader’s Digest, on February 5th of this year. Sebelius basically admitted to pressuring media outlets to report disinformation to the public in place of information that does not support the safety of the government’s most heavily promoted drug. As shocking as this statement was the first time I read it, I honestly could have predicted such a scenario.

Edited by kim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

http://www.jlaforums.com/link.php?url=http...ink-autism.html

 

New American research shows that there could be a link between the controversial MMR triple vaccine and autism and bowel disease in children.

 

The study appears to confirm the findings of British doctor Andrew Wakefield, who caused a storm in 1998 by suggesting a possible link.

 

Now a team from the Wake Forest University School of Medicine in North Carolina are examining 275 children with regressive autism and bowel disease - and of the 82 tested so far, 70 prove positive for the measles virus.

 

Last night the team's leader, Dr Stephen Walker, said: 'Of the handful of results we have in so far, all are vaccine strain and none are wild measles.

 

'This research proves that in the gastrointestinal tract of a number of children who have been diagnosed with regressive autism, there is evidence of measles virus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.jlaforums.com/link.php?url=http...ink-autism.html

 

New American research shows that there could be a link between the controversial MMR triple vaccine and autism and bowel disease in children.

 

The study appears to confirm the findings of British doctor Andrew Wakefield, who caused a storm in 1998 by suggesting a possible link.

 

Now a team from the Wake Forest University School of Medicine in North Carolina are examining 275 children with regressive autism and bowel disease - and of the 82 tested so far, 70 prove positive for the measles virus.

 

Last night the team's leader, Dr Stephen Walker, said: 'Of the handful of results we have in so far, all are vaccine strain and none are wild measles.

 

'This research proves that in the gastrointestinal tract of a number of children who have been diagnosed with regressive autism, there is evidence of measles virus.

There, was that so hard? All these years later, they decide to see if its true... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...