What's the difference between PANDAS and all the other recognized autoimmune diseases? They have a test. MS has a test, NMDA encephplay has a test, RF has a test. None of the tests are 100% - all diagnosis also rely heavily on clinical evidence, as well as other supporting tests. And even witht he tests, it takes along time to get diagnosed. But for Pandas its near impossible - because we don't have a "test". But we do. And Swedo uses it. Why the heck don't pandas "experts" add the cunningham test to their arsenal when talking about diagnosing PANDAS? they all cite her work, and use it? Why do