Jump to content

Existing forum users need to log into the forums and website with their email address and password. Become a premium member to access enhanced forum features and visit our online store to view our products.

New eBook: Your Child Has Changed; Should You Consider PANDAS?

Have you seen the ACN Latitudes PANDAS eBook?  Our helpful book is a 37-page primer in a friendly question & answer format.  This eBook contains useful information to understand the symptoms of PANDAS, how it is diagnosed (including lab tests), the different types of treatments, approaches for prevention, and how to find the help and support that you need. Learn more



Which handsfree headsets are best?

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_Sara_*

  • Guests

Posted 24 January 2003 - 11:13 AM

I have heard that some hands free headsets are more effective than others to reduce the radiation exposure you receive from your cell phone. I think some are filled with air instead of wire, etc. Is there a difference?

Also, who conducts these tests? Are the phone companies funding them tests and can we trust the results that they boast?

I use my cell phone very often and am concerned... thanks for your help!

#2 Margaret Meade Glaser

Margaret Meade Glaser


  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 28 posts

Posted 04 February 2003 - 02:29 AM


According to bioelectromagnetics specialist, Dr. Robert Kane, not all
headsets are equal in their ability to reduce the RF radiation emitted
by cell phones, and some may be ineffective. While it is generally a
good idea to use headsets if you use a cell phone, he cautions that
none of the headsets reduces the level of RF below the threshold of some
biological effects seen in lab studies (in some cases, levels
approaching zero).

As for "air-filled" headset leads, Dr. Kane says these actually still
have electric conductors inside that are surrounded by air, and that any
plug-in headset communicates some amount of radiation to the user.

The cell phone industry makes no claims about radiation reduction with
headsets and reports no testing results. In my opinion, it is always
wise to have non-connected, independent labs do such testing. First,
there must be a recognized concern about non-thermal (non-heating)
levels of RF radiation, then there must be great financial resources,
for such testing is very expensive and there are few independent labs in
the world that can do it.

Unfortunately, I don't have a source to give you on comparative headset testing. As for who does such testing, one example that I know of was some sponsored by a magazine in the UK, I believe, and its published results were very controversial. There are many factors to be considered and controlled for in test design.

Just a note about Dr. Kane, he is an engineer who was involved in the development of the cell phone. He is also the author of "Cellular Telephone Russian Roulette" which traces the history of wireless health research before, during and after the phase of cell phone development.
Margaret Meade Glaser
EMR Network, Board of Directors

#3 Guest_Sara_*

  • Guests

Posted 24 February 2003 - 12:52 AM

Thanks for your reply! I will do my best to find some research on the topic... that's done by independent labs!!

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users